In October of 2023 I went on a trip with my family to New York to see my grandmothe. While I was there my Uncle took me around to a couple of his favorite second hand shops. I saw the usual Land Cameras and older Kodaks that tend to pop up in those places, but hidden among some “collectibles” was a small Rollei box. That caught my eye immediately, but when I went over to inspect I found that it was just a couple of filters by themself. No camera. I picked it up anyway because I figured I could use it with my Rolleiflex, and I love the beautiful Rollei boxes for decoration.
Then I saw the familiar sight of the brown leather Rollei case in a glass cabinet. I quickly saw that it was a Rolleicord and had no price tag on it. My uncle went to one of the workers who he knows from his times visiting there, and asked how much. They asked $200, but I was not going to pay that for a Rolleicord when I already have a Rolleiflex. Quickly looking it over, I saw there was no rust and the leather was pretty good. I told him it was probably worth $100 and I don’t know if it works. The guy wasn’t happy with that offer. Then the owner walked over and he said it was fine. I was happy and surprised. I was over the moon because I hadn’t found a good camera in the wild before.
It flew back with us in my carry-on back to Florida. As soon as we got home I got to inspecting it and loading it. After some research and a couple test rolls, I found that the shutter works, and it is a Rolleicord III from the early 1950’s. So let’s get into some info on the Rolleicord.
Just a reminder as with all of my reviews, if you prefer, you can watch my video review instead located at the end of this article.
The Rolleicord III
Franke and Heidecke were well known for high end and pricey cameras by the time they introduced the Rolleicord. If you want to learn more about their beginnings, check out my review of the Original Rolleiflex. But today I’m going to talk about the Rolleicord.

This model was one of the most common ones sold with some 87,000 examples out there. According to my 1962 edition of The Rollei Way, once Rolleiflex started using automatic film transport, they were able to introduce a less expensive model. It goes on to say it was for the photographer who was interested in a twin lens reflex camera without the trimmings of a Rolleiflex. Made to the same standard of precision but with less refinements of operation. I think that is a great way to describe the two sisters.
The Specs
The taking lens on my variant is a coated 75mm Schneider Xenar f/3.5. The viewing lens is a Heidosmat 75mm f3.2. The ground glass on mine is pretty dim. I don’t know if it can be replaced or if it’s worth doing so. It has been an issue when in lower light.
The button in the center of the film advance knob has to be pressed after each frame in order to advance. The shutter then has to be cocked using the lever under the taking lens and then pushed the opposite direction to take a photo. It feels very simple, like an old folding camera, while at the same time having modern features like the automatic stops.




The shutter is a Compur-Rapid with speeds of 1 second up to 1/500th and Bulb. The shutter speeds and aperture are adjusted by two separate levers. While looking down into the camera, you can see the small windows to make these adjustments in the same position.



The Rolleicord uses 120 film and gives 12 frames in square format. The pressure plate inside the door can be pushed to accept 35mm film for using the Rolleikin adapter.
My Experience with the Rolleicord III
This camera, when I compare it to my Rolleiflex Automat made during the same time, is lighter and doesn’t feel as refined. The film advance knob vs the crank on my rolleiflex takes a little more time and makes it feel simpler. The shutter cocking lever on the Rolleicord also contributes to this primitive feel when compared to the Rolleiflex.



However, those things don’t take away from the value of this camera in terms of it doing its job. The Rolleicord III may be the simpler, plain Jane version of the Rolleiflex, but it does the same job.


Ive enjoyed taking this camera on family walks because it is lighter around my neck than my Rolleiflex, and it being a TLR, I found myself less afraid to take photos because I wasn’t blatantly holding up a camera to my eye where everyone could see and get suspicious.



As for picture quality, that comes from the quality of the lens and of the shutter. You can see in several of my photos there is quite a bit of lens flare and a little vignetting. To me this gives it that vintage camera feel that some people may be looking for. For others, it may be a downside of the Rolleicord.



Rolleicord III VS the Rolleiflex Automat
While this isn’t an article comparing the Rolleiflex to the Rolleicord, I suspect that you’re here because you’re trying to choose between a ‘cord or a ‘flex. I would say that my Rolleiflex Automat produces much clearer photos and feels every bit of the price difference when compared to my Rolleicord. When comparing the process of taking a photo with the two, I’d say the Rolleicord is more complex despite it being made for simplicity just because it takes more steps.


With my Rolleiflex I set the speed and aperture with two wheels on either side of the taking lens, and take the photo with a button. The film is advanced and the shutter cocked with one motion of the crank forward and then slightly back. The Rolleicord is set using two separate levers on either side of the taking lens. The shutter cocked by another lever under the same lens, and picture taken by then pushing that lever the opposite direction. Then film is advanced by first pushing in the button on the advance knob before turning the knob to the next frame.
These are all very simple differences. I just wanted to lay them out for anyone who may be trying to decide which one is worth their money, and suited for their needs.
Sign up to never miss an article from AVCA!
Final Thoughts
This camera is very special to me because it will always be attached to the memory of my grandmother, who I saw for the last time right before I went to that store that day and found it. You can read about that here.
I hope that if you are reading this before you purchase a Rollei that it has been some help to you. If you’re here because you love cameras, I hope that you have enjoyed my Rolleicord III journey so far. I have reviewed a 1929 Rolleiiflex Original and I’ve written about my Rolleiflex Automat if you’d like to check those out. I’ll be properly reviewing my Automat soon. I thought I had already! So stay tuned for that.
Let me know in the comments if you prefer a Rolleicord or a Rolleiflex. Do you like TLR cameras or do you prefer SLR’s? Talk to me.
Until next time, stay motivated and keep shooting.
Please consider supporting my work by making a donation or buying one of my zines through the yellow button below. If you want to purchase a camera, please consider using one of my affiliate links as well.
Buy a Rolleicord from KEH
Or BUY a Rolleicord from eBay
BUY FILM From KEH
These are affiliate links to KEH Camera, and eBay. Simply purchasing through these links, you’re supporting my work with no additional cost to your purchase. It’s greatly appreciated.

A tarnished mirror can cause the viewfinder to be dim. The eBay seller marty1107 has replacement mirrors in case you want a DIY project. Dark corners on the viewing screen are caused by the lack of a field lens. Replacement Fresnel screens are available from Rick Oleson at https://bright-screen.com/ if you want still another DIY project.
Thank you very much!
You can tame most flare with the correct Rollei hood.
Correct. But the photos I was having an issue with were taken indoors in low lighting and I suspect some haze in the lens could be the issue.
What a great find, and an interesting article.
I was surprised that you found the images from your Rolliecord not as good as from the Rollieflex, the Xenar lens on the cord should give you very similar results. As for the flare a lens hood would help greatly here I think. Great pics and post, I’ve just subscribed. I found your blog though a recommendation from Jim Grey by the way.
Oh I’m glad to hear that! You’re right a lens hood probably would’ve helped that. I have one for my Rolleiflex I’ll have to try it on the cord.
Wonderful review. Thank you for that, and welcome to the Rolleicord III Club (some restrictions may apply). The RCord III was my first TLR after years of turning my nose up at square format. Found a very early one (didn’t know it at the time of course) on eBay in 2019 and decided to give it a “go”. It was love at first sight. Mine has the Carl Zeiss Triotar 3 element lens. Not as exciting as a Tessar but it performs extremely well. The camera is tough as nails too. Considering I tripped on a hike over some vines and fell face first on top of it (I was 240lbs at the time too), the camera never “blinked an eye” and kept going strong. It has since had a CLA and the viewfinder glass replaced with a Rick Olesson Bright Screen. HUGE difference! I highly recommend having that done.
Thank you! I’m definitely going to look into getting a new screen from Rick.
Hi Ally,
thanks for this good article. I also use both cameras as both have their advantages as you already depicted. Even though my Rolleicord is from the beginning era far before WWII whilst the Flex comes from the same period as yours, I can confirm most of your statements. It’s even so that nowadays, good Rolleiflex are more difficult to find compared to the Cords, as too many Flexes are undergoing home repair attempts in order to achieve huge margins when selling them. Two typical home repair shop flaws are flipped lenses and “cleaned” mirrors. The Rollei mirrors shall never be touched with whatever one considers good for cleaning. Ultrasonic bathes are also an absolute no-go.
Accordingly, one may want to thoroughly check offered Rolleiflexes for sharpness of the images shot and for deteriorations of the viewing quality most probably caused by scratches an delaminations of the front silver coating. Destructed mirrors can easily be exchanged by looking for referring in the US and a good screwdriver. For this, please check Rolleiflex and Rolleicord repair groups in Facebook.
The darkness of the viewfinder can be improved by laying a cut out plastic Fresnel lens flat onto the viewfinder glas. Both cameras accept the lens to remain there when closed.
The following link shows such a modification made by a German guy.
https://youtu.be/-PWVE3CXs0Q?si=e0PNxXA1rbiezJAG
The vignetting irritates me quite a bit. Usually, the pictures keep their quality to the edges. And even filters do not penetrate the light coming from the corners.